Happy new year.

A big year is facing the working class and it's allies in Australia. As was seen in spotfires throughout 2011, such as the Qantas dispute (tied in directly with ambitions to shift Qantas into a foreign company), the big blue and eventual victory of the workers at the Baiada chicken plant in Laverton and finally to the lockout of workers at the Schweppes plant in Tullamarine, the imperial capitalist class is looking toward 2012 as the year in which they make even more open their intent to dominate the working class and indeed the majority of Australian society. So, in 2012, we must heed the words of the slogan of the old Builder's Labourers Federation: 'Dare to struggle, Dare to win!, if you don't fight you lose!'.

60 years since the defeat of the outlawing of the Communist Party.

It is now sixty years since the victory of the people against the most vicious attack on civil rights ever made by an Australian government. Menzies and his Liberal government proposed a referendum that would have banned membership of the Communist Party, made it a criminal offence. At first it appeared as if this referendum would get up easily, but fortunately, wide sectors of the community realised that this issue was about more than simply sticking it to the reds. This was an attack on everybody, this bill would have given Menzies (a man who had expressed sympathy for Hitler as late as 1938, some food for thought) the power to essentially outlaw any association or grouping he saw as subversive. Wide sections of the community mobilized into the broadest united front possibly ever seen in Australia, and in the end the bill was narrowly defeated. In the face of current attacks on fundamental democratic rights in Australia, through bodies such as the ABCC and with issues facing us such as the ever increasing imperialist domination of our 'democracy', there are many lessons to be learnt from the work of communists within this united front, and how it relates to our experience today. All Australian  Marxist-Leninists should take this opportunity to reflect upon the experiences of 1951, and think about what lessons can be gained from this. One of the ideas that flows out of this is that we need to establish the broadest unity we possibly can, beginning amongst ourselves. We nee to work closer on the issues that unite us, and focus on these, not the questions and issues that divide us.

Join the fight for a just, sovereign, democratic Australia

Get involved with Spirit of Eureka!

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Spirit-of-Eureka/125076617550647?ref=ts

www.spiritofeureka.org

ETU Elections

The results for the Victorian ETU election are not too far away and this will be a short and sharp analysis. Dean Mighell and the Full Charge team have over the years been proven to provide greater representation and victories for their constituents as compared to interstate, all within the scope of independence from the ALP, the ingredient which other state branches do not bring to the table. This proves that it is not only possible to survive life outside of the pocket of the ALP, but that it is indeed many times better for workers. The Reconnect team is using independent rhetoric in order to confuse workers, but make no mistake, they are being funded by ALP heavies and industrial fat cats to bring the ETU away from militancy and back into the party line. They are using bald faced lies and hypocrisy to accuse the Full Charge team of corruption. I call it hypocrisy as the Reconnect ticket is built bringing back to the Victorian ETU the gravest form of corruption that afflicts most of the union movement in Australia, that of handing over member's union fees to the ALP, a party that outright opposes their interests and pursues a blatant anti-worker, pro-imperialist, pro-capitalist agenda. A victory to the Full Charge ticket creates an opportunity to espouse the advantage of militant, independent leadership to the broader mass of workers and create a movement for workers to take back control of their unions from the ALP and their associated lackeys.

Education under Capitalism

While I’m typing this article doubtless many VCE students will be furiously pounding the pen and paper in an effort to ace their mid-year exams, and I wish you all well in your endeavour to pull as high an ATAR as you possibly all can, in order to land yourself a plum degree/’job ticket’ and land a job post university. I do, however, regret, that the whole educational process as ordained by Western society, including the integral role played by exams, has sapped the education system (in particular the universities) of what should be its fundamental and absolute function, that being the quest for knowledge, learning and advancement. In the place of everything the education system should be, we currently have the complete anti-thesis of this, a network of  ‘degree factories’, where from early on students are moulded into all the different pawns that this overtly competitive society requires.

Right from the beginning, in primary school, students are taught the basics that are needed to hold down the most menial of jobs, without the slightest bit of attention paid to their emotional, artistic and broader cultural development, as of course, these qualities are not required and independent thinking and learning would simply distract students from the tasks at hand. The sorry state of organized sport as part of the curriculum at primary schools only serves to compound this. The further developed students are identified as useful and are sifted through into accelerated programs, whilst less able students are embarrassed and chastised as a consequence of poor NAPLAN results, while kids with developmental issues or lack of ability to cope with emotional issues, perhaps compounded by the nature of their schooling are slapped with the tag ADHD and are medicated into submission, in part to cover up the inadequacies of such as system in relation to such children. 

Once the ordeal of primary school is through, the student is pushed on into the great societal sorting factory that is secondary school. Here is where, through the examination process, the future administrators of society are sorted out from the plebs, and everything in between. Our erstwhile protagonist is forced in choosing from what may appear to be a broad spectrum of subjects, which in fact allow no room at all for independent though or learning. This enables generation after generation to acquire the skills to keep things going as they currently are and practically nothing else. A common phenomena is that of being frowned upon if a career path is not decided upon very early in the piece, thus perpetuating this culture of sticking on the straight and narrow and not indulging in what interests you but is not relevant to your pre-ordained path. A common tactic employed nowadays are SRC style committees, which simply provide a similar diversion to the great ‘democratic’ institution of parliament, which cunningly perpetuates the grand illusion that the direction of society is actually moulded by the broad mass of people, and not in the high-powered boardrooms.

Back to exams, if you do get the score you require, you will head to university presumably, where you will be exposed to another 3-5 years of the same bullshit being regurgitated over and over again, still no room for independent thinking, a period of intellectual monotony that essentially equates to a lengthy application process for a ticket to whore your fertile mind out to a system and it’s benefactors that don’t care for you, the just want to suck out what you’ve got to give intellectually for their own gain. Sure, you may end up quite ‘well off’, but in terms of using that fertile mind of yours, nothing will go on. Your superior mind will be used to perpetuate this vicious cycle for years to come.  Others above you will gain far more from this bondage than you, those who effectively hold your mind to ransom will be in excess of twenty times better off . But the universities are independent entities some may argue! A simple look at the big business interests that reign supreme on university boards are all that are needed to refute this dead duck.

All this, and the prospect of NOT getting what you want hasn’t even arisen yet! In all likelihood you will slip into a dead end job, which involves no intellectual reward, but instead hours upon hours of monotony in service of capital. You could potentially end up working in a bank, for example. The boss will promise you that if you work hard, and be persistent, you too can rise to the top! The objective fact is that, in spite of effort, only a small percentage can rise above the rest of the subordinates. You will spend your working days in service of such an institution, an institution which is, in a sad irony, an integral part of the society that coldly rejected you at exam time.

The same applies no matter where you work, no matter what situation you are in. The same interests that dig out our minerals and expropriate what wealth belongs to us all, the same interests that are in charge of the parasitic banks, the same interests that directly influence all government policy are one and the same as the interests that set the educational agenda. They seek out suitably capable minds to act as the effective ‘human computers’ of capital, to keep it running smoothly, while the rest are tossed aside on a heap, and the mansions of the rich are kept clean on the back of the surplus value they generate.

Such a stifling and inhibiting system cannot and will not be allowed to last forever.

Organization

It would, to me, seem rather obvious that for a working class movement, claiming to represent the highest aspirations of the proletariat, as all self-proclaimed proletarian vanguard parties obviously would, would at the very least make their best efforts to have substantial links within the working class and organize in a manner that allows them to work most efficiently, effectively and naturally. But as with most things about the so-called 'revolutionary left' in Australia, and indeed most of the Western world, logic and facts simply do not apply. The theory of the Mass Line, and it's core principles of being connected with the masses, organizing amongst the masses and simultaneously teaching and learning from the masses are ignored. In addition to this, in order to preserve security of party members, maintain the organic nature of organization and enable the party to function effectively, small groups of cadre must maintain close links with each other and the working class, with a looser connection to other such 'branches. This form of organization is best as it ensures the focus of revolutionaries on their mass links, is a far more natural form of social relation than 30 or so people in a room and enables more robust and full formation of ideas. This model of organization stands in stark contrast to the organizational principles of our 'super-revolutionaries', which, from experience, is the definition of 'left-blocism'. That is, small groups of isolated cadre bereft of links with the proletariat simply congregating in groups as large as they can muster, with the 'leaders' preaching about how miserable the world is, while the others listen, nod in agreement and think about how they will attain their next paper sale. Discussion within the party essentially does not exist and ideas are thus not thrashed out and developed, leading to poorly formed strategies which are never in fact even carried out due to the lack of organization within the working class. The strict following of the principles of the Mass Line is thus vital for any revolutionary socialist programme to make any impact at the all with the masses.

The fruits of the land belong to the people

BHP, Rio Tinto, Xstrata and co. are all foreign controlled mining conglomerates. What do they have in common aside from being insidious agents of imperialism? They are taking what rightfully belongs to the people of Australia. The mining sector pays some of the lowest rates of tax in Australia, whilst the taxes of ordinary, hard-working Australians fund their roads, their machinery, ports and railways. Effectively we are subsidizing their 'investment, so they can ship mega-profits home! Their rates of profit have risen 900% over the last 9 years, and now they cry poor when a government tries to take a little back. These conglomerates steal our sovereign wealth, ruin our environment and push indigenous Australians off their native lands. It is the opinion of all progressive Australians that our resources must be nationalized in order for us to reap the full fruits of our sovereign resources, so we can provide a prosperous future for all Australians, not line the pockets of a few poms, yanks and their lackeys over here. But as a minimum, immediate demand, we must fight for the mega-profits of these imperial giants to be taxed heavily so that the Australian people can reap the rewards of their sovereign resources, and strengthen the democratic rights to a free education, free healthcare and other vital amenities. Australian resources in Australian hands!